<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Security &#8211; It Takes a Village</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/2008/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/2008</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interop Las Vegas 2008 - Some Interesting Stats &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/2008#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Interop Las Vegas 2008 - Some Interesting Stats &#124; ScienceLogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/14/2008/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] a complicated network in two weeks, but then to keep it up and running 100% of the time in the wild west environment that is Interop, is really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a complicated network in two weeks, but then to keep it up and running 100% of the time in the wild west environment that is Interop, is really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Futher Comments About Interop and Interoperability &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/2008#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Futher Comments About Interop and Interoperability &#124; ScienceLogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/14/2008/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently Alan wrote an interesting post about the lack of “interoperability” at Interop, but we saw just the opposite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently Alan wrote an interesting post about the lack of “interoperability” at Interop, but we saw just the opposite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wilde</title>
		<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/2008#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sciencelogic.com/network-security-it-takes-a-village/05/14/2008/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Nice post Louis.   In New York or next year, it might actually be kind of cool, instead of just having the "NOC Tour", but to do one of the following:

1.  Do a video documentary on how InteropNet is setup
2.  Hold a class for the attendees on "Challenges with Interoperability" and have a panel of NOC sponsors.

There's a lot the attendee's could learn at the show--about how the show works.

-michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Louis.   In New York or next year, it might actually be kind of cool, instead of just having the &#8220;NOC Tour&#8221;, but to do one of the following:</p>
<p>1.  Do a video documentary on how InteropNet is setup<br />
2.  Hold a class for the attendees on &#8220;Challenges with Interoperability&#8221; and have a panel of NOC sponsors.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot the attendee&#8217;s could learn at the show&#8211;about how the show works.</p>
<p>-michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
