<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMWare is Better Than Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/vmware-is-better-than-microsoft/09/2008/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/vmware-is-better-than-microsoft/09/2008</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VMworld 2008 Keynote &#8211; with Paul Maritz &#124; ScienceLogic</title>
		<link>http://blog.sciencelogic.com/vmware-is-better-than-microsoft/09/2008/comment-page-1#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>VMworld 2008 Keynote &#8211; with Paul Maritz &#124; ScienceLogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sciencelogic.com/vmware-is-better-than-microsoft/09/2008#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>[...] just what the planned vStorage and vNetwork will deliver) &#8211; but all of it VMware-centric. As we said in an earlier post, they&#8217;ve moved away from &#8220;defending&#8221; the hypervisor business proposition to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just what the planned vStorage and vNetwork will deliver) &#8211; but all of it VMware-centric. As we said in an earlier post, they&#8217;ve moved away from &#8220;defending&#8221; the hypervisor business proposition to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
